Skip to content

Solve more SonarQube issues #763

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
bouwew merged 9 commits into from
Jun 28, 2025
Merged

Solve more SonarQube issues #763

bouwew merged 9 commits into from
Jun 28, 2025

Conversation

@bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew commented Jun 28, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Improved dictionary iteration for better efficiency and readability in battery and thermostat scanning logic.
    • Simplified conditional checks for cooling sensor data.
    • Updated test function parameter names for clarity and changed some setup functions from asynchronous to synchronous.

  • Tests

    • Renamed parameters in test functions for clearer intent and updated all related references.
    • Adjusted test setup functions to be synchronous where applicable.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

"""

Walkthrough

The changes involve minor refactoring across three files. Iteration over dictionaries is streamlined by removing unnecessary list copies. In tests, a parameter is renamed from timeout to timeout_happened for clarity, and some asynchronous setup functions are converted to synchronous ones. No core logic or control flow is altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
plugwise/data.py Refactored dictionary iteration to use .copy().items() instead of list(...items()); simplified a nested conditional into a single combined if statement.
plugwise/helper.py Changed iteration over self._thermo_locs.items() to avoid explicit list conversion.
tests/test_init.py Renamed timeout parameter to timeout_happened throughout; converted some async setup functions to synchronous; updated all references accordingly.

Poem

In the garden of code, a rabbit hops,
Tidying loops and renaming stops.
Dictionaries copy, async turns tame,
Parameters clearer, all just the same.
With paws on the keyboard, changes are made—
Another neat patch in the burrow is laid! 🐇
"""

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 Pylint (3.3.7)
tests/test_init.py
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71cd420 and d70f243.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/test_init.py (10 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • tests/test_init.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Run pytest using Python 3.13
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch sc-fixes-2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 28, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (bd253bf) to head (d70f243).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #763   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines         3452      3410   -42     
=========================================
- Hits          3452      3410   -42

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jun 28, 2025

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@bouwew bouwew marked this pull request as ready for review June 28, 2025 07:53
@bouwew bouwew requested a review from a team as a code owner June 28, 2025 07:53
@bouwew bouwew requested a review from CoMPaTech June 28, 2025 07:54
@bouwew bouwew merged commit f6eb523 into main Jun 28, 2025
17 checks passed
@bouwew bouwew deleted the sc-fixes-2 branch June 28, 2025 07:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech CoMPaTech approved these changes

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@bouwew @CoMPaTech